Do you believe that "religion is the enemy of science"? Do you believe that 'evolution-deniers' are "holding back progress"?

Since 2009, we have had John Holdren as our Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, more commonly referred to as our Science Czar.

 In 1977, he co-authored the textbook Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment; they discussed the possible role of a wide variety of solutions to overpopulation, from voluntary 'family planning' to enforced population controls, including compulsory abortion, adding sterilants to drinking water or staple foods, forced sterilization for women after they gave birth to a designated number of children, and discussed "the use of milder methods of influencing family size preferences" such as access to birth control and abortion.

First lady Michelle Obama to begin pushing water ...and just because of coincidence, doesn't mean we should become paranoid, suspicious, or cease trusting others.  She is promoting a good thing here. And she also promotes fruits and vegetables, which I like.  What I don't trust ...are those who promote unhealthy ideologies as the Science Czar has done.  And I also wonder how I can trust the judgment of who is recommending or appointing the likes of him and many others that seem to hold unhealthy ...and in some cases, very dangerous ideas that they adhere to.

6:00 AM 09/12/2013

Drink to your health, they say ...and I think it's healthy and will continue to drink lots of water. I'm not worried about having a sterile mind.

“We don’t have time for a meeting of the flat-Earth society,” Obama said. “Sticking your head in the sand might make you feel safer, but it’s not going to protect you from the coming storm.”  --- I ask, "What is guiding that statement?"

Former Soviet Union President Mikhail Gorbachev emphasized the importance of using climate alarmism to advance socialist Marxist objectives: “The threat of environmental crisis will be the international disaster key to unlock the New World Order.” ---that objective is clearly stated.

Our President also said, "...it is about ensuring that scientific data is never distorted or concealed to serve a political agenda and that we make scientific decisions based on facts, not ideology." ---I say, "Oh, really?"

Let me mention at the very top, that many people who are renown for their intellectual achievements ...have put together many solid theories, based on their extensive studies, and those theories have remained relatively unchallenged for many years now. Therefore, these theories have been widely accepted as fact.

• Theory #1:  Everything that exists has come about as a result of an action or reaction upon something that had already existed.

• Theory #2:  Everything that exists, has changed.  And irregardless of whether we agree that is a positive change, or a negative change ...is irrelevant to the point that it has indeed changed over time.  And we call that change ...evolution.

• Theory #3:  Non-living particles have evolved into living particles. This is promoted whether we speak of quarks, leptons, or antiparticles ...if you imagine them randomly coming into contact with other energy entities, to combine, and create new forms of energy.  Subatomic particles collide, some reacting favorably, to cluster and form living particles ...in essence, evolving from non-living to living.

• Theory #4:  We exist.  As the great philosopher, Descartes, reasoned, "I think, therefore I am".

These well-documented and widely accepted theories of evolution are problematic ...and theories #1, #2, and #3 can't be true. Why, how dare I say that!! I'll tell you why ...

Why??

What I'm going to tell you is simple:  With evolution, there has to be 'a beginning something'.  Something had to exist first, for everything else to evolve from.  But, it cannot be explained what that first thing was, and where it came from.

And ignoring that fact, changing the subject, or reducing particles ...so we can't see them, does not suffice.

• Fact #1:  The Bible is well-documented, widely distributed ...and up until recent campaigns, has been widely accepted.

• Fact #2:  God is not confined within evolutionary reasoning, nor any other reasoning.  We must reason that truth ...and evaluate every aspect of our lives upon the basis of that truth if we are to know any meaningful truth at all.